In this article, we propose to address the issue of Austral Líneas Aéreas Flight 9 from a broad and detailed perspective. This topic is of great relevance today and has generated great interest in different areas. Over the next few lines, we will explore the most relevant aspects related to Austral Líneas Aéreas Flight 9, analyzing its impact, its implications and possible solutions or approaches to address it. With a comprehensive approach, our goal is to offer a complete and detailed overview that allows our readers to fully understand this topic and form an informed opinion about it.
![]() An Austral Líneas Aéreas BAC One-Eleven similar to the one involved | |
Accident | |
---|---|
Date | November 21, 1977 |
Summary | Controlled flight into terrain due to pilot error |
Site | Cerro Pichileufú, Argentina |
Aircraft | |
Aircraft type | BAC One-Eleven 420EL |
Operator | Austral Líneas Aéreas |
Registration | LV-JGY |
Flight origin | Aeroparque Jorge Newbery, Buenos Aires |
Destination | San Carlos de Bariloche Airport, Bariloche, Río Negro Province |
Occupants | 79 |
Passengers | 74 |
Crew | 5 |
Fatalities | 46 |
Injuries | 33 |
Survivors | 33 |
On November 21, 1977, Austral Líneas Aéreas Flight 9 crashed near Bariloche, Argentina, killing 46 of the 79 people on board.[1]: 1, 5 [2]
Three aircraft had been chartered to carry 31 newlyweds to Bariloche for their honeymoon, with the accident aircraft being the second to depart.[3] While climbing to 35,000 feet (11,000 m), the aircraft experienced pressurization problems and had to descend to 29,000 feet (8,800 m). At 00:40, the flight was cleared for an Instrument Landing System (ILS) approach to runway 28, but abandoned the approach due to a VOR receiver problem. the pilot then requested a visual approach to runway 10, but then decided to do another approach to runway 28 using another ILS procedure. The pilot then reported that the aircraft was near the VOR beacon. This was the last transmission from Flight 9. The aircraft then crashed into a mountain killing all five crew members and 41 passengers.[4]
Investigators determined that the flight crew descended prematurely and did not follow allowed the ILS procedure, possible due to the VOR signal malfunctions, and the captain's mental state.[1]: 10