This article will address the topic of Commission on Parliamentary Reform from different perspectives, in order to provide a broad and complete vision of this matter. Historical, cultural, social and scientific aspects related to Commission on Parliamentary Reform will be analyzed, with the aim of providing the reader with a detailed and enriching overview. Different opinions and approaches will be explored to encourage reflection and debate, with the intention of expanding knowledge and promoting a deeper understanding of Commission on Parliamentary Reform. Through this article, we aim to offer a global and enriching vision that invites reflection and critical thinking.
The Commission on Parliamentary Reform was an independent group, established in October 2016 by Ken Macintosh, the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament. It is chaired by John McCormick and published its report, with recommendations, on 20 June 2017.
When the Scottish Parliament was set up in 1999, a Consultative Steering Group developed some of the parliamentary structures and procedures.[1] Changes in technology since the Parliament was formed have affected how civil society engages with it.[2] Macintosh’s predecessor Tricia Marwick had also tried to look at how the parliament functioned.[3]
The Commission was asked to consider how the Parliament scrutinises legislation, how the committee system functions and the extent of the parliament's independence from the Scottish government.[4]
The commission met for first time on 7 November 2016.[5] In January the committee took evidence from two former Labour First Ministers Jack McConnell and Henry McLeish.[6] The Commission will publish its report, with recommendations to the Presiding Officer, on Tuesday 20 June 2017 at 10.00 am.[7]
John McCormick was announced as chair, ahead of his retirement from the Electoral Commissioner for Scotland in December 2016.[8]
Other members of the commission were:
The commission had support from all the party leaders in the Scottish Parliament.[1] The members nominated by their parties to sit on the commission are:[9]
There were recommendations around the effective use of chamber time, included ceasing the practice of using scripted diary questions from party leaders to open First Minister's Questions (FMQs). The report suggested scrapping the requirement for selected questions to be published ahead of the session and granting the Presiding Officer the power to rule out questions "which do other than seek to genuinely scrutinise the minister".[10][11]