In this article, we will explore in depth Discrimination of excellence and its impact on different aspects of everyday life. From its relevance in history to its influence on today's society, Discrimination of excellence has been the subject of interest and debate over time. We will analyze how Discrimination of excellence has shaped interpersonal relationships, technological development, politics and culture in general. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we will examine the many facets of Discrimination of excellence and its implications in the contemporary world. This article seeks to provide a comprehensive and enriching vision of Discrimination of excellence, allowing the reader to understand its meaning and scope in the global context.
Part of a series on |
Discrimination |
---|
![]() |
Discrimination of excellence[1] is the violation of formal equality of opportunity[2] and meritocracy,[3] which reward merits of individuals and overachievement.[1] Discrimination of excellence can be caused by different reasons, including legacy preferences,[4] nepotism, substantive equality,[2] affirmative action[5] or random luck.[6]
Gifted education has been criticized on substantive equality grounds.[7]
Legacy preferences for college admissions have been criticized.[4] Discrimination against excellent students during admissions to Ivy League has been debated during 2019 college admissions bribery scandal. The United States Department of Justice scrutinized higher education over potential systemic biases in college admission standards that would underweight transparent standardized testing criteria due to affirmative action.[8] Harvard College has been sued in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College due to individuals outperforming on standardized college admission tests but not being admitted. Non-merit-based admissions practices, degree conferral or promotion standards have been criticized.[9]
Academics, teacher and students were intentionally targeted during Cambodian genocide.[5] Khmer Rouge chose new teachers by ideology, affirmative action, and not by teaching excellence, which resulted in high illiteracy.[5]