George v. Victor Talking Machine Co.

In this article, we are going to explore the impact of George v. Victor Talking Machine Co. on contemporary society. George v. Victor Talking Machine Co. has been a topic of constant interest and its influence extends to different areas, from popular culture to politics and economics. Over the years, George v. Victor Talking Machine Co. has sparked debates and controversies, generating conflicting opinions and diverse positions. In this sense, it is crucial to critically and objectively analyze the role that George v. Victor Talking Machine Co. currently plays, as well as its possible evolution in the future. Through detailed analysis, we hope to offer a comprehensive and enriching view on George v. Victor Talking Machine Co., allowing our readers to better understand its scope and meaning today.

George v. Victor Talking Machine Co.
Argued December 5, 1934
Decided December 17, 1934
Full case nameGeorge v. Victor Talking Machine Co.
Citations293 U.S. 377 (more)
55 S. Ct. 229; 79 L. Ed. 439
Holding
The district court's ruling of infringement of a song's common law copyright, granting an injunction so that damages could be determined, was interlocutory. The appeal came too late, so the Court vacated the appeal.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
Willis Van Devanter · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · George Sutherland
Pierce Butler · Harlan F. Stone
Owen Roberts · Benjamin N. Cardozo

George v. Victor Talking Machine Co., 293 U.S. 377 (1934), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the district court's ruling of infringement of a song's common law copyright, granting an injunction so that damages could be determined, was interlocutory. The appeal came too late, so the Court vacated the appeal.[1]

References

  1. ^ George v. Victor Talking Machine Co., 293 U.S. 377 (1934)