Jacques Curie

Today, Jacques Curie is a topic that arouses great interest and debate in various areas. Its impact extends to politics, the economy, society and culture in general. As time has progressed, Jacques Curie has become a central point of discussion and reflection for many. Its relevance only increases, and its influence is felt more palpably in our daily lives. Therefore, it is crucial to fully understand what Jacques Curie means and what implications it has on our lives. In this article, we will explore this very important topic in depth and discuss its many facets and dimensions.

Jacques (1856–1941, left) with his brother Pierre (1859–1906) and his parents Eugène Curie (1827–1910) and Sophie-Claire Depouilly (1832–1897)

Jacques Curie (29 October 1855 – 19 February 1941) was a French physicist and professor of mineralogy at the University of Montpellier.[1] Along with his younger brother, Pierre Curie, he studied pyroelectricity in the 1880s, leading to their discovery of some of the mechanisms behind piezoelectricity.[2]

He is buried in the Saint-Lazare cemetery in Montpellier.

Biography

In 1883, Jacques Curie was appointed professor of mineralogy at the University of Montpellier. This appointment marked the end of his collaboration with his brother Pierre. He remained in Montpellier until his death in 1941 with the exception of the years 1887–1889, which he spent in Algeria, teaching at the School of Science of Algiers and conducting his research.[3] It was not until 1903 that he was appointed to the chair of physics, a position he retained until his retirement in 1925. His son Maurice Curie was a physicist.

Research and discoveries

The major legacy of Jacques Curie is the discovery of the piezoelectric effect with his brother Pierre in 1880. The two brothers were then laboratory assistants at the Faculty of Sciences of Paris, under the direction of Charles Friedel. The accounts of their discovery generally give Jacques Curie only a minor role in favor of his brother Pierre. Doubtless the comparison between the latter's brilliant career and the more quiet one of Jacques gives some reason for this, however there is no evidence that Jacques was limited to a minor role:[4] In particular he had more experience than his brother in the study of pyroelectricity. In fact it is almost impossible to clearly separate the contributions of the two brothers as they constantly shared their ideas. According to Shaul Katzir,[4] one must consider the discovery as a joint contribution.

The Curie–von Schweidler law refers to the response of dielectric material to the step input of a direct current (DC) voltage first observed by Jacques Curie[5] and Egon Ritter von Schweidler.[6]

See also

References

  1. ^ Senior, John (1998). Marie and Pierre Curie. Sutton. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-7509-1527-4.
  2. ^ Manbachi, A. and Cobbold R.S.C. (November 2011). "Development and Application of Piezoelectric Materials for Ultrasound Generation and Detection". Ultrasound. 19 (4): 187–196. doi:10.1258/ult.2011.011027. S2CID 56655834. Archived from the original on 22 July 2012.
  3. ^ Chatelain, Y. (1961). Dictionnaire de biographie française. Paris, Librairie Letouzey et Ané, 1961. pp. "Jacques Curie" p. 1400.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link) CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  4. ^ a b Katzir, Shaul. The Discovery of the Piezoelectric effect. Archives for the History of Exact Sciences, vol. 57, 2003. pp. 61–91.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  5. ^ Curie, Jaques (1889). "Recherches sur le pouvoir inducteur spécifique et sur la conductibilité des corps cristallisés". Annales de Chimie et de Physique. 17: 384–434.
  6. ^ Schweidler, Egon Ritter von (1907). "Studien über die Anomalien im Verhalten der Dielektrika (Studies on the anomalous behaviour of dielectrics)". Annalen der Physik. 329 (14): 711–770. Bibcode:1907AnP...329..711S. doi:10.1002/andp.19073291407.