In this article, we are going to delve deeper into the topic of Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and explore all its facets. Nuclear Age Peace Foundation is a relevant topic and of great interest to a wide audience, as it affects many areas of our daily lives. Throughout this article, we will examine different aspects related to Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, from its historical origin to its impact on today's society. Through a detailed analysis, we will try to shed light on this issue and provide a more complete view of what it really entails. We hope that upon completion of reading, readers will gain a deeper understanding and appreciation of Nuclear Age Peace Foundation's topic.
![]() | |
Formation | 1982 |
---|---|
Founders | David Krieger |
Legal status | 501(c)3 |
Official language | English |
President | Ivana N. Hughes |
Website | www |
The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation (NAPF) is a non-profit, non-partisan international education and advocacy organization. Founded in 1982, NAPF is composed of individuals and organizations from all over the world. It has consultative status to the United Nations Economic and Social Council and is recognized by the UN as a Peace Messenger Organization.[1]
NAPF's mission is to "educate, advocate, and inspire action for a just and peaceful world, free of nuclear weapons." Its vision is "Pursuing and achieving a just and peaceful world, free of nuclear weapons."[2]
NAPF engages in advocacy and education programs. Its educational projects include the Sunflower e-newsletter, which provides monthly information and analysis of nuclear and international security issues, and its Nuclear Files, which chronicles the history of nuclear weapons. NAPF works with elected officials and decision-makers around the world to advocate for nuclear weapons abolition.
In 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation consulted with the Marshall Islands when it filed cases against the nine nuclear-armed countries (United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, Israel, India, Pakistan, North Korea) in the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. The lawsuits make the central claim that these nations have failed to comply with their obligations under international law to pursue negotiations aimed at the complete elimination of their nuclear weapons.
Five of the nuclear-armed countries are parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Article VI of the NPT requires that parties "pursue negotiations in good faith" aimed at "complete disarmament." The lawsuits contend that the other four countries, while not bound to the NPT, are obligated by customary international law to pursue nuclear disarmament.
Presenting evidence that all nine nuclear-armed countries continue to update and enhance their nuclear arsenals while failing to take disarmament negotiations seriously, the lawsuits allege that each nuclear-armed country is in breach of its international obligations. The case filed in the U.S. Federal District Court is particularly historic, as it is the first time that the U.S. has been charged in domestic court for violation of an international disarmament treaty. The U.S. government has filed an official "notice of appearance" and has named a legal team to defend it in court.[3]
Members of NAPF's Advisory Council help spread the organization's message worldwide. Members of the Advisory Council include:[4]