In today's world, SN 2006X is an issue that has become increasingly relevant in society. Whether due to its impact on health, its influence on popular culture or its importance in the global economy, SN 2006X has become a focus of attention for experts, academics and the general public. Throughout history, SN 2006X has been the subject of debate and discussion, generating endless opinions and perspectives. In this article, we will explore the different facets of SN 2006X, analyzing its evolution over time and its role today. From its impact on technology to its relevance in the political sphere, SN 2006X continues to be a topic of universal interest that continues to generate interest and analysis.
![]() M100 before and after the supernova explosion | |
Event type | Supernova ![]() |
---|---|
Ia | |
Date | February 4, 2006 |
Constellation | Coma Berenices |
Right ascension | 12h 22m 53.92s |
Declination | +15° 48′ 31.2″ |
Epoch | B1950.0 |
Distance | 65 mly[1] |
Redshift | 0.0036, 0.007, 0.0067, 0.0071, 0.0068, 0.0037, 0.0043 ![]() |
Host | M100 |
Peak apparent magnitude | +13[2] |
Other designations | SN 2006X |
![]() | |
SN 2006X was a Type Ia supernova about 65 million light-years away[1] in Messier 100, a spiral galaxy in the constellation Coma Berenices. The supernova was independently discovered in early February 2006 by Shoji Suzuki of Japan and Marco Migliardi of Italy.
SN 2006X is particularly significant because it is a Type Ia supernova. These supernovae are used for measuring distances, so observations of these supernovae in nearby galaxies are needed for calibration. SN 2006X is located in a well-studied galaxy, and it was discovered two weeks before its peak brightness, so it may be extraordinarily useful for understanding supernovae and for calibrating supernovae for distance measurements. It may even be possible to identify the progenitor of this supernova.[citation needed]