User:Bon courage

In today's world, User:Bon courage remains a topic of great importance and interest to a wide public. Its relevance transcends borders and generations, and its impact has been felt in various spheres of society. From its emergence to the present, User:Bon courage has been the subject of debate, analysis and reflection, constantly generating new perspectives and approaches on its meaning and influence. In this article, we will explore the many facets of User:Bon courage, examining its evolution over time and its relevance in the contemporary context. Through a detailed analysis and a critical look, we will seek to delve deeper into the meaning of User:Bon courage and its impact on our lives, offering a comprehensive vision that allows us to understand its importance in today's world.

The Cynic's Appendix

Shortcut
There is no Cabal

If MastCell has the Old Testament and Bishonen the New, then perhaps this is the Apocrypha?

  1. Wikipedia is famously the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. This is not necessarily a good thing.
  2. For working on content in controversial areas, it is better to be beloved by admins, than to be an admin.
  3. If a new editor draws attention to their newness in their initial edits, they're not new.
  4. Any editor who argues their point by invoking donations to Wikipedia, has no viable point.
  5. Any editor who argues their point by invoking "editor retention", is not an editor Wikipedia wants to retain.
  6. A sure tell of a POV-pushing argument is when WP:PSTS is truncatedly quoted as "primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia ..."
  7. Certain words and phrases are strongly indicative of WP:PROFRINGE proclivities: allopathic (except in a historical context), healing arts, medical (or scientific) dogma, modality, pseudoskeptic, scientism, and Western medicine.
  8. AP2 rots your teeth.
  9. Any editor who uses the word "bias" as an adjective, will turn out not to understand WP:NPOV.
  10. Rejoice when your callow opponent posts to your mature, well-watched User Talk page: the bat signal is now aloft.
  11. Any editor who quotes Mahatma Gandhi's "first they ignore you, then they laugh at you ..." in support for their point, doesn't have a point that deserves to progress beyond the "laugh" stage.

Essays

Userboxes