User talk:Annakoppad

Hello, Annakoppad, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

PamD 07:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Annakoppad: If you want to save Pyladies from proposed deletion, you don't add {{deprod}} to the article or to your talk page. As it says on the template, you may simply remove the template from the article. But you are strongly encouraged either to improve the article to meet the reason for deletion, or to say why you disagree. In this case, the organisation has not been shown to be WP:NOTABLE in Wikipedia terms - it needs to show independent reliable sources about the topic, not just its own facebook page etc. If a newspaper or magazine has had an article about the group, for example, please give that as a reference.

I also noticed the article you started at Patent Information System, but have moved it to a title which matches the content: Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Intellectual Property Management, with links from RGNIIPM and NIIPM. Again, please add external sources which show the notability of this institution; it might be better perhaps as a section within the article on Indian Patent Office, unless there is more to say about it than that it exists. PamD 08:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Annakoppad. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pyladies Bangalore, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
• instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. PamD 08:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Anna, Pyladies Bangalore sounds like a splendid and worthwhile local organisation, but (a) there's no evidence that it should have its own Wikipedia article, and (b) if it does, you as founder should not be writing it. I suggest that you contribute something on the talk page of the main PyLadies article, suggesting content about the Bangalore chapter which should be included in that article. PamD 08:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

I've left a comment at Talk:PyLadies. PamD 08:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Prasanna Venkata Dasa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Annakoppad/test, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Altamel (talk) 05:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Since you created a duplicate copy in your userspace, I assume you are alright with the article namespace version being deleted? Altamel (talk) 05:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Indeed I am. Please delete this page!

A tag has been placed on Shashi Malik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Aninda Sinha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 14:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

As an article about a living person which gives no sources, I've nominated this article for WP:BLP PROD. PamD 16:51, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Sriram Ganapathy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Poonam rani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Nanjangud Tirumalamba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:08, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Deepika Thakur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Monika malik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Debashree Mazumdar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

As you can see, Wikipedia has guidelines for what is and what is not notable. Furthermore, EVERY article needs references. I suggest you read through some of the guidelines on what is and what isn't notable. Keep in mind that while you may think a teacher is notable, WP:PROF we go by Wikipedia guidelines, the same is for athletes. Sir Joseph (talk) 15:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Annakoppad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Sir Joseph, Thanks for writing up in great detail. Regarding the verifiability of my pages, I can quote sources, I do not cut, copy, paste or write things from my imaginations. Especially regarding the Scientists, I have collected the information from them itself, took their permission to write about them on Wikipedia, and then started writing about them. If that does not qualify for verifiability, please do let me know what does? I appreciate your efforts in reviewing and nominating pages that I have created. However, it would make sense to verify if I had the information handy about the content that I was writing. Thanks and regards, Annapoornima

1. Your articles have zero references.
2. Just being a college teacher or even full professor is not notable enough for an encyclopedia. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:42, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

• @Sir Joseph: Articles do not need to be "Notable" from the start. The criterion for an A7 speedy deletion is that no assertion of importance or significance is made, a much lower bar. Some of this editor's articles have references which are not properly formatted as such, like the "further reading" in Monika Malik.

Anna, you need to make sure that you make it clear in each article why that person is Notable. I see that you have given Monika Malik categories suggesting that she is playing in the Rio Olympics, but you have neither stated that fact nor given any reference which supports it. Find that reference, give that information, and she not only is not eligible for speedy deletion as A7 but automatically gets "Notability" under WP:ATHLETE.

You do not need to "take permission" to write about anyone: in fact if you know them well you should not be writing about them - see WP:COI. You need to find independent reliable sources, and then use these as references, showing which part of your article is supported by which source (not just as a list of "further reading").

As another point: please do not invent categories, unless you are going to actually create them. If when you have edited an article the category is shown in red it it because it does not exist. Please also note that we don't include all the "parent" categories, so if someone is in Category:Indian female field hockey players we don't also need to add Category:Indian field hockey players or Category:Indian sportswomen, though it's reasonable to add Category:Sportswomen from Haryana (which I have just created, as it fits into the existing hierarchy of categories). PamD 16:28, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

In particular watch out for capital letters in category names: it's "Indian field hockey players" not "Indian Field Hockey Players", and it matters. PamD 16:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

@PamD: I will use devote more efforts on formatting from now on wards.

The article Debashree Mazumdar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability, fails ATHLETE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Aninda Sinha page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Both WorldCat and GoogleScholar show nothing significant to suggest better for the professors notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giridhar Madras and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aninda Sinha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aninda Sinha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 16:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

The article Nanjangud Tirumalamba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, doesn't seem to pass guidelines for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 20:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event:

1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
5. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes, Addis Wang
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Amit Kumar Bhattacharjee has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Giridhar Madras, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Lithopsian. Annakoppad, thanks for creating Banibrata Mukhopadhyay!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I'm concerned that the article lacks references for much of the biographical information, and also that the impression given about the discovery of super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs is not historically correct.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Lithopsian (talk) 20:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Amar Pandit. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

The article Avijit Arya has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks Chrissymad for the comments, added more references. Annakoppad (talk) 03:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Annakoppad

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay Hunter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Hunter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

I am getting paid to write articles by Avni Sharma.

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that she has been paid by Avni Sharma for some of her contributions to Wikipedia.

Annakoppad (talk) 10:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello Annakoppad,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fortis Bangalore for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 03:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penny De Villiers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny De Villiers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Would you please explain what you meant in this comment, where you wrote I am the owner of the article.? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 04:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

By owner of the article, I mean that I created the article and I am still looking out so that the page not be deleted. Thanks, Annakoppad (talk) 04:30, 6 December 2017 (UTC)::

Thanks for replying. I'll have more to say about that in a moment. Would you please disclose if you are being paid, have been paid, or expect to be paid, for this work? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 04:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

I am being paid for this work.I have not received money still but I am promised that they will pay me. Thanks Annakoppad (talk) 07:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. Have you disclosed this somewhere before now? Also, would you please disclose who is paying you, and if you are an employee of Fortis, a freelancer, or are working through an agency? Jytdog (talk) 14:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

I have disclosed about getting paid to write, on my talk page. Avni Sharma is paying me this time. I work as a freelancer, the payer is not the same. Annakoppad (talk) 15:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Annakoppad

So... the PAID policy and the Terms of Use require specific disclosure. What you have done so far is not OK with respect to disclosure, and you are also editing directly on behalf of your clients, which is not what you should do. So let's start with getting disclosure completed. We need to assemble a list of the articles and who paid for them. Before we do that, however, would you please clarify if Avni Sharma is paying you out of his/her own personal bank account, or if Avni Sharma is an employee of a company (or runs a company), and that company is actually paying you? For example there is an Avni Sharma who is a VP at Operation Write, a digital marketing company. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 16:27, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jytdog, can you please point me to the paid policy and the terms of Use? I know Avni Sharma paid out of her personal bank account.I do not know much of her background. Annakoppad (talk) 11:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Annakoppad

WP:PAID. So I can help you get the disclosure done appropriately. So you need to disclose "employer, client, and affiliation" for each paid edit. Please start by listing here, all the articles you have edited for pay, and who paid you, and who the client was, and the affiliation. I will give you some examples, where there are question marks, I don't know the answer but am giving examples

• article = Fortis Bangalore, employer = Avni Sharma (you said this is who is actually paying you), client = Fortis Healthcare (?), affiliation = hired through Freelancer (?). (if you were a freelancer hired by Avni Sharma through the Freelancer website)

It could also be:

• article = Fortis Bangalore, employer = "DigitalMarketing, Inc," (?) client = Fortis Healthcare, affiliation = nothing additional. (if you were an employee of a digital marketing or PR agency that was hired by Fortis)

It could be:

• article = Fortis Bangalore, employer = "DigitalMarketing, Inc", (?) client = Fortis Healthcare, affiliation = hired though UpWork. (if you were contracting for a digital marketing or PR agency that was hired by Fortis, and you were contracted through Upwork)

Would you please provide that list below? Once that is done, we can get the disclosure done correctly and then we talk about the "prior review" step. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 14:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

• article = Amar Pandit, employer=Mehul Shah affiliation= affiliation= hired via Craigslist
• article = Avijit Arya employer =Mohit Bhatt affiliation= direct reference
• article = Fortis Bangalore employer= Avni Sharma affiliation= direct reference
• article = Geysar Gurbanov employer = Rahul Anand affiliation = linkedin post
• article = Adam Bragg employer= Mehul Shah affiliation= hired via Craigslist
• article = Beagle (company) employer= Manjunath affiliation = direct hire
• article = Penny De Villiers employer= Penny De Villiers affiliation = direct hired via Linkedin. Added to list 04:22, 18 December 2017
• article = Jay Hunter employer= Manjunath affiliation = direct hire. Added to list 04:22, 18 December 2017
• article = Blueshift Labs Inc employer= Bharat Shah affiliation = direct hire Added to list 04:22, 18 December 2017

Annakoppad (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Because the list above was edited eight days later than the date of the signature, I have annotated the entries which were added later for clarity. PamD 08:18, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for this. Does that list include all edits you have made in Wikipedia where you were paid, or expected to be paid? (for example, if you were contracted to write an article and it was deleted so you didn't get paid, you still need to disclose that you did it with expectation of being paid) Please also add "affiliation" (for instance if you were hired through UpWork or Freelancer or the like, please add that). Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 21:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

• You have gone back to editing and we have not finished this process. Would you please come back and finish this discussion about disclosing? We then have to talk about the 2nd step of the conflict management process. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 16:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I missed your comment.Please let me know what more needs to be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annakoppad (talk • contribs) 14:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

In the same diff where you wrote that "apology", you added some affiliations. You have not responded to the question "Does that list include all edits you have made in Wikipedia where you were paid, or expected to be paid?". Please respond. Jytdog (talk) 20:25, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Those are all the articles that I got paid for. The rest of my articles, I did it for free. Annakoppad —Preceding undated comment added 01:13, 17 December 2017

Please sign your posts using four tildas, like everyone else in WP does. Thanks.

So what about Penny De Villiers, Jay Hunter, Banibrata Mukhopadhyay (I mean, here you wrote that "The information on the page is as I have received it from the professor himself." so there is some kind of external relationship there..)? Just wanted to ask a last time, and then we will move on. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 03:07, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Ok, I got paid by Penny herself to do the article on her. She found me on Linkedin. But that got deleted. Jay Hunter was paid by Manjunath. I did Banibrata Mukhopadhyay for free, where I got the information is at Indian Institute of Science.Annakoppad (talk) 03:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Annakoppad

Listen, I have other things I want to do in Wikipedia. I am trying to help you fully disclose and then learn how we manage conflict of interest, but you are giving me half-answers that contradict other things you say. Here you wrote that "The information on the page is as I have received it from the professor himself. But just above you wrote that you got the information from IIS. Please disclose, all the work you did for pay or for expectation of pay, who paid you and any relevant affiliation. If you give me another half-answer, I will stop trying to help you and start working to have you indefinitely blocked. Jytdog (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jytdog, I got the information from the professor Banibrata Mukhopadhyay himself who works at Indian Institute of Science. I don't have any more paid work apart from the ones I have mentioned here.Annakoppad (talk) 03:28, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Annakoppaad

OK:

1) Would you please copy the list above to your Userpage? It should be disclosed there. It should also be disclosed at the Talk page of any relevant article. I took care of those (see for example here -- you should do this yourself).

2) Would you please disclose your connection with Banibrata Mukhopadhyay? I can accept that he did not pay you, but you obviously have some connection, since he sent you the material that you posted. Would you please define the relationship? Paid editing is only one kind of conflict of interest. There are many kinds.

3) I want to move this along, so please see below about what else you should do, along with the disclosing. Jytdog (talk) 04:27, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

I worked for a brief period @ Indian Institute of Science where Banibrata Mukhopadhyayalso works. He is a professor.I have never met or spoken to him. But I have found his email ID on the institute website. Annakoppad (talk) 05:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Annakoppad

Please do reply above. I am just starting a new section to save scrolling.

Thanks for disclosing your paid editing above, as well as your relationship with Banibrata Mukhopadhyay whatever that may be.

So you have conflicts of interest for all those topics, as we define that in Wikipedia.

As I noted above, disclosure is just the first step. There is a second step to COI management in Wikipedia -- prior review. This piece may seem a bit strange to you at first, but if you think about it, it will make sense. In Wikipedia, editors can immediately publish their work, with no intervening publisher or standard peer review -- you can just create an article, click save, and voilà there is a new article, and you can go into any article, make changes, click save, and done. No intermediary - no publisher, no "editors" as that term is used in the real world. So the bias that conflicted editors tend to have, can go right into the article. Conflicted editors are also really driven to try to make the article fit with their external interest. If they edit directly, this often leads to big battles with other editors.

What we ask editors to do who have a COI or who are paid, and want to work on articles where their COI is relevant, is:

a) if you want to create an article relevant to a COI you have, create the article as a draft through the WP:AFC process, disclose your COI on the Talk page with the Template:Connected contributor (paid) tag, and then submit the draft article for review (the AfC process sets up a nice big button for you to click when it is ready) so it can be reviewed before it publishes; and

b) And if you want to change content in any existing article on a topic where you have a COI, we ask you to

(i) disclose at the Talk page of the article with the Template:Connected contributor (paid) tag, putting it at the bottom of the beige box at the top of the page; and

(ii) propose content on the Talk page for others to review and implement before it goes live, instead of doing it directly yourself. Just open a new section, put the proposed content there, and just below the header (at the top of the editing window) please the {{request edit}} tag to flag it for other editors to review. In general it should be relatively short so that it is not too much review at once. Sometimes editors propose complete rewrites, providing a link to their sandbox for example. This is OK to do but please be aware that it is lot more for volunteers to process and will probably take longer.

By following those "peer review" processes, editors with a COI can contribute where they have a COI, and the integrity of WP can be protected. We get some great contributions that way, when conflicted editors take the time to understand what kinds of proposals are OK under the content policies. (There are good faith paid editors here, who have signed and follow the Wikipedia:Statement on Wikipedia from participating communications firms, and there are "black hat" paid editors here who lie about what they do and really harm Wikipedia).

But understanding the mission, and the policies and guidelines through which we realize the mission, is very important! There are a whole slew of policies and guidelines that govern content and behavior here in Wikipedia. Please see User:Jytdog/How for an overview of what Wikipedia is and is not (we are not a directory or a place to promote anything), and for an overview of the content and behavior policies and guidelines. Learning and following these is very important, and takes time. Please be aware that you have created a Wikipedia account, and this makes you a Wikipedian - you are obligated to pursue Wikipedia's mission first and foremost when you work here, and you are obligated to edit according to the policies and guidelines. Editing Wikipedia is a privilege that is freely offered to all, but the community restricts or completely takes that privilege away from people who will not edit and behave as Wikipedians.

I hope that makes sense to you.

Will you please agree to learn and follow the content and behavioral policies and guidelines, and to follow the peer review processes going forward when you want to work on the any article you are paid to work on, or where you have some other form of COI? Do let me know, and if anything above doesn't make sense I would be happy to discuss. Best regards Jytdog (talk) 04:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your time. I have read the above.Some of it,I understand. I agree to learn more and follow. Annakoppad (talk) 05:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Annakoppad

OK< if you have any questions about this, let me know. The basic idea is that you should disclose any conflict of interest you have and propose content, instead of editing directly. Jytdog (talk) 05:53, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello Annakoppad,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Beagle Company for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 15:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

The article Adam Bragg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTSPAM. A promotional article created by an undisclosed paid editor in violation of the Terms of Use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Joe (talk) 11:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

The article Geysar Gurbanov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTSPAM. A promotional article created by an undisclosed paid editor in violation of the Terms of Use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Joe (talk) 11:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

The article Avijit Arya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTSPAM. A promotional article created by an undisclosed paid editor in violation of the Terms of Use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Joe (talk) 11:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

The article Amar Pandit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTSPAM. A promotional article created by an undisclosed paid editor in violation of the Terms of Use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Joe (talk) 11:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. – Joe (talk) 15:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avaza software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avaza software until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Joe (talk) 15:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Avaza software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Joe (talk) 15:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Intellectual Property Management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ipindia.nic.in/public-training-schedule-rg.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Joe (talk) 15:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Amar Pandit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 02:44, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Beagle (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 02:45, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Blueshift Labs Inc, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 02:46, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Bragg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Bragg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Joe (talk) 11:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amar Pandit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar Pandit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rentier (talk) 19:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

It is important that people can see who said what, when, on any talk page. Please remember to sign all and date all your posts, and take great care when editing previous posts so that you do not leave a misleading impression as to when information was added. It is better to add a new, signed and dated post, rather than make a substantial change to an existing post. I have added the date of the late additions to your list of paid editing, and dated a couple of your posts, for clarity. PamD 08:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit that you did yesterday. I will sign talk edits. Annakoppad (talk) 03:52, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Annakoppad

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avijit Arya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avijit Arya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Joe (talk) 15:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

The article Dineshkumar Harursampath has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:PROF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Joe (talk) 09:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

1. article = Amar Pandit, employer=Mehul Shah affiliation= hired via Craigslist
2. article = Avijit Arya employer =Mohit Bhatt affiliation= direct reference
3. article = Fortis Bangalore employer= Avni Sharma affiliation= direct reference
4. article = Geysar Gurbanov employer = Rahul Anand affiliation = linkedin post
5. article = Adam Bragg employer= Mehul Shah affiliation= hired via Craigslist
6. article = Beagle (company) employer= Manjunath affiliation = direct hire
7. article = Penny De Villiers employer= Penny De Villiers affiliation = direct hired via Linkedin.
8. article = Jay Hunter employer= Manjunath affiliation = direct hire.
9. article = Blueshift Labs Inc employer= Bharat Shah affiliation = direct hire

Annakoppad (talk) 15:22, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Annakoppad

Please explain why you did this and this. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

I was asked by Mehul Shah to remove the tag. Thanks and regards, Annakoppad (talk) 03:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Hm. Please don't do that. The tags are there to inform editors working on the article about the background. Our general practice is to have the paid editing disclosure at the user page and at the article talk page. That is our practice; it is does not matter what your client wants. Jytdog (talk) 04:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annakoppad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not do anything here with this account. My friends Swarajin2009 and Bengaloorugirl have been blocked. We use the same internet connection. Please unblock me

Decline reason:

Account now directly blocked due to sockpuppetry. only (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser needed: Annakoppad appears to be appealing an autoblock here from Bengaloorugirl (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). When looking into this, I noticed this edit at the WP:COIN where Bengaloorugirl made a comment as if she were Annakoppad, then removed it, and then Annakoppad made essentially the same comment 4 minutes later.

Swarajin2009 removed speedy templates and prod templates from Annakoppad's articles and also contributed significantly to the Beagle article. Annakoppad is claiming they're "friends" but there seems to be significant overlap here. only (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

 In progress.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

• The following accounts are  Confirmed:
  • Annakoppad (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Bengaloorugirl (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Swarajin2009 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• The claim they are "friends" using the same Internet connection is not credible as (1) they are using more than one range and (2) they are using the same devices.
• The following accounts are  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to Annakoppad:
  • Itsnotajokemate (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Mahesh.muthukumar (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Gopal Kamiredddy (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Gopal KV (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Ayush TV (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• I've blocked/reblocked all the accounts without tags. @Sir Sputnik: Can I impose on you to tag the accounts? Use CU confirmed tags on the first three and suspected tags on the others. I'm fairly certain Annakoppad is the oldest account. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
• @Bbb23:  Done. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
  • @Bbb23 and Sir Sputnik: thanks for handling this. only (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beagle (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beagle (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rentier (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:BeaglesCompanyLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC)