User talk:GSK

Today we are going to dive into User talk:GSK, a topic that has captured the attention of many people as of late. User talk:GSK is a topic that covers many areas of interest, from science to entertainment, including social and cultural issues. In this article we will explore different aspects related to User talk:GSK, from its impact on society to the advances that have been made in this field. Additionally, we will discuss the controversies and challenges User talk:GSK is currently facing, as well as possible solutions and future prospects. Get ready to delve deeper into the fascinating world of User talk:GSK!


Home • Talk • Edits • Awards • Aliases • CSD • PROD
Click here to leave me a message



Hi I received your message about the link I saved. It was supposed to be a link to the People article announcing that the show would be premiering on HBO and then streaming on Max. Is that not what came through?Nkwade0318 (talk) 15:04, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Please read WP:CITEHOW and WP:CITEWEB to learn how to include reference links properly. We don't typically add links to section headers, as you did in the article. GSK (talk • edits) 15:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Got it, thanks! Nkwade0318 (talk) 17:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Edit to POLYBIUS page on March 4th

HI, on March 4th I made an edit to the Polybius page, including a description of and linking to a book inspired by the legend under "other media." The link went to the publisher's webpage. I'm the author of the book, and would like to have it included on the page as it's directly inspired by the legend and touches on a fair amount of lore. I've not edited a page here before and while tried to make sure I followed the rules, perhaps I missed something. Could you let me know, so I could make the edit and not have it taken down? Thanks

~~~~ Taskerlands (talk) 19:50, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi. It might be considered a conflict of interest since you wrote the book and are therefore editing about yourself. I'm not very knowledgeable about this, so you may want to seek help editors that are at the Teahouse instead. GSK (talk • edits) 20:03, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
OK, thank you, was I mistaken then that you removed the edit I made? Again, I'm trying to figure this out as I go, so if I pinged you in error I apologize. I'll check the other editors out.
~~~~ Taskerlands (talk) 20:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

The Amazing Digital Circus

I read your reason on why you reverted my changes.

I honestly didn't mean any trouble with those changes.

I apologize for causing any inconvenience. 5UP3RN0V42015 (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

No apologies necessary! I'm not mad, and you didn't cause any trouble. To be honest, I didn't even know it had been covered on the talk page until I went looking for it. It's all good. GSK (talk • edits) 21:56, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Crossed actions

Sorry, we crossed actions. Do you want me to undo and we proceed with the prod? I have no strong opinions of how the page is dealt with. I just know the page isn't ready for mainspace as is, and I question what purpose the page serves. Zinnober9 (talk) 00:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Nah, it's all good. I forget that WP:DRAFTIFY is a thing. As for the purpose, I agree with you there. I think the article's creator is attempting to transfer articles (and templates) from Logopedia, for some reason. GSK (talk • edits) 00:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Ok. I've gotten bitten a few times in the past nominating for deletion some junky "mainspace draft" pages that others viewed as "premature articles" so I tend to WP:DRAFTIFY on the more edge cases. But now that they've crossed into copyvio delete territory, choice of actions is a bit moot. Thanks for finding and taking action on that. Hope you are having a nice weekend. Zinnober9 (talk) 01:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, it's been a calm weekend so far. I hope you're doing well too. GSK (talk • edits) 01:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)