User talk:Sadko

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Hello Sadko, Would you like to translate/create the article about Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386) for the SR Wikipedia? Portraits of her are made by Maurice Quentin de la Tour in 1766 and 1771. Boss-well63 (talk) 23:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Not right now, but thank you for reaching out. You might want to try posting your request here. — Sadko (words are wind) 01:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Aleksa Đukanović

Could one of the editors publish this draft as a regular article?

Vogoje (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

You need to add more references (Biography). — Sadko (words are wind) 16:02, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. This is the original article. (https://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-ec/%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B0_%D0%82%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%9B) Can you supplement it from here and publish it on English Wikipedia?

@Sadko, jesi li ti "naš" Sadko, sa srpske vikipedije? Vogoje (talk) 18:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, please use English, as this is EWP. I kindly encourage you to complete your own work, but if you need any additional assistance, feel free to reach out to me. — Sadko (words are wind) 00:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

@Sadko Ok, no problem.The text page in Serbian is identical to the one in English. I don't know what else to add. Can you insert what you think is missing and post it on ENG Wikipedia? Vogoje (talk) 21:28, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Each project has its own standards and requirements. As I mentioned, you need to add more WP:RS. — Sadko (words are wind) 21:38, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

What else? Source? More personal biographies? Vogoje (talk) 21:51, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Articles, reviews, books and so on, take your pick. Please read WP:RS. — Sadko (words are wind) 21:55, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

OK Vogoje (talk) 22:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

@Sadko Look now, I've completed it. Is it enough?Draft:Aleksa Đukanović Vogoje (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Critical reception (selection) needs to be removed. It looks somewhat better. — Sadko (words are wind) 01:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

OK, removed. Can you publish the page now? Vogoje (talk) 01:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

You should go ahead and publish the article. I'm unsure about EWP local rules or guidelines regarding direct requests for publishing a draft like this one. — Sadko (words are wind) 01:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

How do I publish it? I don't know. I am not an editor or an administrator. I don't see an option for that. That's why I asked you if you could help me with the publication? Vogoje (talk) 01:26, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

We're all editors. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for creation. — Sadko (words are wind) 01:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

@Sadko

Yes, I found it now. I just posted. Thank you very much.

I hope no one deletes the article from the editor. Greetings! Vogoje (talk) 01:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

My pleasure. Best. — Sadko (words are wind) 10:17, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Recently in the insurgency in Kosovo article you removed my edit in the result parameter which stated that the KLA captured most of Drenica because it didnt belong in the result parameter. I apologize for my mistake however i have a question? Can the KLA capturing Drenica be added in the "territorial changes" parameter on the infobox? Peja mapping (talk) 11:46, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I suppose so. However, I wouldn’t go that route, as including that information would require listing all other changes, potentially sparking new edit conflicts. It’s simpler to incorporate it within the text; just my two cents. Best. — Sadko (words are wind) 11:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Ok thanks for your advise. Btw i was reading Template:Infobox military conflict and the result parameter stated that its not appropriate to add multiple results or say "tactical victory but strategic defeat", so would it be better if a "See aftermath" result was added isntead and most of the things in the result section to be moved to the aftermath section. Peja mapping (talk) 14:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome. Take care. — Sadko (words are wind) 18:18, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Ok but should a "See aftermath" result be added. I already made an aftermath section on the article which would suit being added into the result parameter. It also states on Template:Infobox military conflict that adding a "See aftermath" result should be used in situations like this.Peja mapping (talk)

Try using the TP first and see what the other editors think. I'm confident we'll find a solution we can all agree on. — Sadko (words are wind) 14:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Sadko, how are you doing, I hope everything is excellent.

I started editing Wiki because of the dire state of pages related to the Serbian medieval conflicts, mostly really bare-bone List of wars involving Serbia in the Middle Ages.

I believe I did a good job overhauling it, using only academic sources and trying to stay as objective as possible. However, when I checked the talk section of the List, it was of low-importance across the board. Is there any way I could improve this rating?

Also, it got B-class status because it didn't meet Coverage and accuracy criteria, which is strange to me because it is one of the more detailed lists and well-referenced, there is 0 original research, and every piece of information from academic works. How do I improve this?

I understand that you are not my mentor, but they are on a brake, so I took liberty to ask you, hope you don't mind

Best regards, Bigi Bigi smoll (talk) 15:17, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, great to hear from you! You've done an outstanding job. I've adjusted the importance level, and from what I can see, it's now CL-class. Maybe one day it could even become a featured list? Also, I'm unsure whether we should highlight the 'victory' sections of the table in green. What do you think? Best. — Sadko (words are wind) 16:43, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thank you soo much

I will try to make it to the featured list, first step is getting in B :)

I still hope Coverage and accuracy criterion gets checked again or at least to get feedback on what is the reason the list doesn't meet it, i would be glad to correct all of the mistakes

Thank you for giving me an excellent idea about adding colors and for your support :)

Best, Bigi Smoll Bigi smoll (talk) 20:56, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Glad to help, Bigi Smoll. Feel free to text me if you need anything. Keep up the great work! — Sadko (words are wind) 21:07, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Sadko! I would like to report @Shqiptaria580 and @Nishjan for Vandalism and POV. Nishjan is constantly reverting edits trying to make claim that Massacre of Albanian in I Balkan war was genocide on article Serbian retreat without showing any proof, and Shqiptaria580 is constantly changing Serbian names of some place or town in Kosovo to Albanian on articles related to Kosovo war. Thank you for seeing this message 156.244.41.151 (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome to report them, but I recommend attempting a conversation first. Best. — Sadko (words are wind) 12:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)