User talk:SafariScribe

SafariScribe is currently experiencing significant stress that may affect their ability to work on Wikipedia. They may choose to work in quieter areas and avoid complicated tasks or areas prone to conflict. They may also respond to talk page or email messages more slowly than usual, and your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

January - February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May - June 2024 User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 5 User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 6 User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

27 February 2025
News and notes: Administrator elections up for reapproval and 1bil GET snagged on Commons Serendipity: Guinea-Bissau Heritage from Commons to the World Technology report: Hear that? The wikis go silent twice a year In the media: The end of the world Recent research: What's known about how readers navigate Wikipedia; Italian Wikipedia hardest to read Opinion: Sennecaster's RfA debriefing Tips and tricks: One year after this article is posted, will every single article on Wikipedia have a short description? Community view: Open letter from French Wikipedians says "no" to intimidation of volunteer contributors Traffic report: Temporary scars, February stars Essay: The source, the whole source, and nothing but the source Obituary: Ümüt Çınar (Kmoksy) and Vinícius Medina Kern (Vmkern)
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

The world was created for all.

No one is perfect even AI's do mis fault. Stay cool, just alert me and I will see it off!

— SafariScribe

If you are here just to castigated me (I know there shouldn't be "d", so it's a mistake; fix it yourself), please don't come here. Find anywhere in your talk page, then ping me for opinion. Welcome to my talk page, and ask questions as you will answer when it's thrown to you. I have no other account and have never edited for any payment whatsoever.

A month ago we talked about an article I wrote. I am a paid contributor. I'm trying to follow all the guidelines and you helped me with that. I added some part to make it more impartial, talking about criticism. This article has already been previously approved by @Qcne. Can you check and see if you can exit drafts again?

The article Sex, Love, Misery: New New York has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, see Talk page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Regarding Draft:Les Borsai

Hello. I have changed the language and reduced puffery. Please have a look at the same. Scenecontra (talk) 13:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Hey @SafariScribe I know that the queue is long, but I have made changes to the language and added links from Fortune, Yahoo! Finance etc. Scenecontra (talk) 00:48, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

@Scenecontra, you have moved the draft and now, it is being assessed at AFD, which is likely going to be deleted. You see the reason for submitting via AFC until you are conversant with the notability guidelines. Without prejudice, good luck. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:58, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

@SafariScribe I think I jumped the gun. Cheers! Scenecontra (talk) 09:10, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

I just wanted to make sure you don't have a problem with me? My last three BLP draft submissions have been denied within hours of submission all by you. As an Afc submission reviewer myself I like to think I am familiar with BLP notability. I want to assume good faith but I would also appreciate some understanding for how the same reviewer denies all my articles within hours of submission when the approximate wait time is three months? You must have a tracker or something to at least see when I create an article? Or are you just denying basically every new BLP submission you see and you doing hundreds of these a day? Czarking0 (talk) 04:34, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

@Czarking0, I am sorry if you think I intentionally decline your drafts. No, I have no personal issues with anybody including you. I am in the mass but will show my analysis after that. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:53, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Oh, you've moved the draft. That's fine. I need not to explain. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

I have not moved Draft: Chen Tonghai which is what sparked my comment Czarking0 (talk) 06:26, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Seeing as you are ignoring these polite requests I ask that you do not review any more of my AfC until you give some explanation here. I am resubmitting Draft: Chen Tonghai Czarking0 (talk) 04:14, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

In addition to response at Draft: Chen Tonghai I am still expecting response here Czarking0 (talk) 23:43, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Ah! I am sorry for the delay; I am very busy these Lenten period. I have accepted the draft since AFC allows a second opinion, and I did check the draft, and found reasons to accept. Although I found only sources about his conviction. Nevertheless, we don't review (accept/decline) drafts because it was submitted by a particular editor, we review using the New Pages feed or any other pending AFC queue. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:53, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Good evening, first of all, I would like to remark that I'm not that familiar with the english Wikipedia, I've done a couple of translations and some sections in individual articles, but I've never created an article before, so I wanted to be very careful in making the best possible article. I would like to explain why I think that the sources are verifiable. First, acording to WP:NONENG, sources that are not in english are allowed as long as there aren't other sources in english, and in the case of the Semana Santa of Segovia, I couldn't find any reliable sources in english, so that should not be a problem.

The next source "Semana Santa en Segovia" by María Mercedes Sanz has been published by an independent library, while the writer is a teacher of Art History in the University of Valladolid and was a councillor of the Segovia City Council in the areas of Culture, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, so she should also be a veriable source.

And finally, I use the website https://www.semanasantasegovia.com/ as a source for the information regarding the brotherhoods and information about them such as their year of fundation or the author of the sculptures they own. The website is supported and backed up by the Regional Goverment of Castile and León, as well as the city council of Segovia and the provincial deputation, as seen at the bottom of the website. This should make it a verifiable source, as it is backed up by the official goverment of the region and is cited to talk about data that could not be manipulated or distorted in order to favour the brotherhoods.

I would really appreciate if you could point out the mistakes I could have made in choosing the sources and tell me how I could improve the draft in order for it to be accepted.

https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://bestencyclopedia.com/Draft:Holy_Week_in_Segovia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mateo MD (talk • contribs) 21:24, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you Mateo MD (talk) 20:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Please link the draft. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:50, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

I've just done it. Again, I would be very thankful if you could help me identify the mistakes I could have made in order to fix them.

Thanks Mateo MD (talk) 21:25, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Early life and career of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 13:05, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

This seems like the least logical thing to remove from the main article, as it is the main description of her life. It is also strangely titled as it covers her whole career, not just the "early" career. If the article needs to be split, it makes more sense to e.g. separate articles about her political and social views. Fram (talk) 13:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

@Fram, I understand your point, but I think the article needs a split as well. During the FAC, some sections, such as the family story, aren't essential to the main article even though they are important for the sake of the Encyclopedia. While I never expected immediate nomination, I recognize that the article is still developing. Deleting it would result in lost of vital informations, which is why I suggest spinning off the extraneous content into a separate article, hence my opposition to the CSD. The split- which is still ongoing- would help streamline the main article while preserving important details about her life. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:29, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Early life and career of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early life and career of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 15:56, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for moving TonewoodAmp from AfC to the article space. In the edit summary I note that you removed the article short description and the infoboxes that I provided. It is my understanding that some components are critical for WikiData to pickup name/value properties (such as Official website (which I manually added to Wikidata). Would you be against adding the infoboxes back into the article? I am COI on the article and making an edit request to restore the infobox would be reverting your edit -- complicating matters.

Thank you Apriltools (talk) 17:20, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

The info box was majorly about the manufacturer, HONZ Technologies, LLC, and that was my reason for removing it. As for the short description, you can use the COI request tool. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:07, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
7		Kambili (talk)	Add sources
5		The Arrangements (short story) (talk)	Add sources
122		Dream Count (talk)	Add sources
64		Orlu, Imo (talk)	Add sources
22		Agbogho Mmuo (talk)	Add sources
43		Palio (talk)	Add sources
60		Abubakar Sadiku Ohere (talk)	Cleanup
29		Gender inequality in Nigeria (talk)	Cleanup
14,001		Netflix (talk)	Cleanup
18		Blessings (novel) (talk)	Expand
53		Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (talk)	Expand
6		USD Castellanzese (talk)	Expand
266		Molecular gastronomy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
129		Theatre director (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,572		Mental disorder (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
62		Uyunid Emirate (talk)	Merge
642		Sex in space (talk)	Merge
21		History of the Jews in Hamburg (talk)	Merge
10		Love's Last Shift (talk)	Wikify
67		Rodney Davis (politician) (talk)	Wikify
391		Buddy Carter (talk)	Wikify
3		Kiru Taye (talk)	Orphan
3		The Palio of Districts of Trento (talk)	Orphan
3		All Shades of Iberibe (talk)	Orphan
22		Zikora (talk)	Stub
3		Jowhor Ile (talk)	Stub
4		Apollo (short story) (talk)	Stub
13		Yemisi Ransome-Kuti (talk)	Stub
12		Jagua Nana (talk)	Stub
8		Destination Biafra (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:27, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Wooden rake Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Rake (tool) Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Kerosene • Jewish deli Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tunde Olaoye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunde Olaoye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 07:11, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi. I believe your close here was incorrect. After discounting rationales that were not based in P&G or were simply "per x" (including Pppery and the IP on the oppose side), I cannot reasonably see how a consensus to not move was reached. The only P/G invoked by the oppose !votes was WP:PRIMARYTOPIC which did not sufficiently counterargue my raising of WP:NATURAL and WP:CONCISE parts of WP:AT.

I would appreciate if this close was vacated. Thanks. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" _(hihi) 23:22, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Really? I rechecked the discussion again and found some reasons to reopen. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:04, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I hope you are well. It has been a whole month since I published my draft Draft: Raid on Barcelona (1115) without anyone reviewing it. I hope you will review it. I would be more than welcome to do so. Thank you for your efforts. @SafariScribe Andoria225 (talk) 19:30, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

I will look at it when I have time. Reveiews are done not by how many months they have been on the queue. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

@SafariScribe It has been reviewed, thanks anyway. Andoria225 (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Aliko Dangote at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 13:53, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
135		University of Ilorin (talk)	Add sources
16		Sam Oye (talk)	Add sources
5		Shaibu Husseini (talk)	Add sources
1,631		Colonialism (talk)	Add sources
482		Sinopec (talk)	Add sources
4		Africa Movie Academy Award for Best Documentary (talk)	Add sources
453		Imo State (talk)	Cleanup
26		Shaki, Oyo (talk)	Cleanup
345		House arrest (talk)	Cleanup
97		Corruption in Illinois (talk)	Expand
11		Jeta Amata (talk)	Expand
68		2023 Nigerian Senate election (talk)	Expand
1,505		Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4		Marquette University Student Media (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
24		Electric harp (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
144		Barnier government (talk)	Merge
39		Drafting dog (talk)	Merge
15		ATCO Electric (talk)	Merge
122		Udom Gabriel Emmanuel (talk)	Wikify
18		Ng Lap Seng (talk)	Wikify
26		Life imprisonment in China (talk)	Wikify
4		Prince B.B Apugo (talk)	Orphan
4		Hua Xi (poet) (talk)	Orphan
4		Sound of Tears (talk)	Orphan
7		The Mayors (talk)	Stub
32		Jenifa (talk)	Stub
31		Bright Chimezie (talk)	Stub
4		Dickson Iroegbu (talk)	Stub
7		Sitanda (talk)	Stub
10		Izu Ojukwu (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:27, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Congratulations, SafariScribe! The list you nominated, List of works by Wole Soyinka, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you so much for taking the time to review the Draft:BioInnovation Institute. I am currently struggling to understand which criteria the references have not fulfilled. All of them appear to me in-depth, reliable, secondary, and independent. This is not a minor entity, it is a Novo Nordisk Foundation and NATO supported organization that is even included in the Ministry of Trade of Denmark, so I would appreciate your guidance to help me fix this. Thank you! 185.168.245.18 (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, forgot to sign myself! Cheers, Gattofr (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

• Fabrica.de.colores (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mapheus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SafariScribe, I hope you're doing well, and I'm sorry to bother you.

Thank you for reviewing my Draft:Mapheus page. You mention that it is not backed by enough reliable sources. Could you give me some more information on which sources are deemed unrealiable? Among the sources I cite are government research institutions (https://www.dlr.de/ and https://sscspace.com/) and scientific publishers (https://aip.org/ and ESA publications). I believe they are reliable.

Also the wikipedia page List_of_rockets_launched_from_Esrange mentions the Mapheus rocket launches, one could in fact link back from there.

Do you have suggestions how I can improve the draft to make it acceptable for wikipedia? There are quite similar wikipedia pages for similar rocket programs, for examples TEXUS or Maser (rocket). It would help me a lot if you could share with me your opinion what these pages are doing better, so that I can improve my draft.

Thank you!

Fabrica.de.colores (talk) 15:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

Thank you for reviewing my page. Can you please give me more feedback on the issue with the sources I provided? Two sources are obituaries. One of them is from an academic press (Bar Ilan University) and one is from the New York Times. What else are you looking for?

Thank you,

Iaroszler1 (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.

Alright mate? I've got off-wiki evidence implicating you in paid editing. I've started a discussion over on coin. Let's get into it shall we? Postit note warrior (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)