User talk:Wugapodes
In today's world, User talk:Wugapodes has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide range of audiences. Both on a personal and professional level, User talk:Wugapodes has been the subject of discussion and debate, generating all kinds of opinions and positions. With the advancement of society and technology, the role of User talk:Wugapodes has taken on a new dimension, which has led to an increase in its importance and relevance in different aspects of daily life. In this article, we will explore the evolution of User talk:Wugapodes, its impact on today's society, and the possible future prospects arising from its growing relevance.
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
March music
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
New month: today is the birthday of Chopin and Ricardo Kanji, see my stories of today and yesterday, with dream music by the first and Bach played by the other. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Today: Carmen turns 150, as the main page and my story tell you. I chose a 1962 concert of the Habanera, - enjoy! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:41, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
On Ravel's birthday, we also think of a conductor and five more composers ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Today I could have written five stories off the main page, and chose Sofia Gubaidulina. I find the TFA also interesting, and two DYK, and a birthday OTD. How about you? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Today: an opera, 100 years old OTD, on Bach's birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Today, 300 years of Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1! We sang works for (mostly) double choir by Pachelbel, Johann Christoph Bach, Kuhnau/Bach, Gounod and Rheinberger! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:55, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Notification of administrators without tools
|
Greetings, Wugapodes. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
TolBot (talk) 21:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby union on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mir Jumla's invasion of Assam on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Good working with you on the GAN Report
Hello Wugapodes. It was an honor to work with you on those small but nice, professionally done changes to the GAN Report. All the best on the coming code optimizations.
I am actually volunteering myself to you as a backup person of maintaining the code, if you need me to. I am interested in how it works as well.
All the best, Prhartcom (talk) 21:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Update: Ha, I just noticed you reviewed my GAN years ago: Little Annie Fanny. Prhartcom (talk) 21:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Prhartcom: You're welcome to help with the GAR bot, but there's not much to do honestly. WugBot's tasks are pretty stable. I took a wikibreak for about a year and it kept chugging along without much trouble. The refactor is to make sure it stays that way even if I forget what I was doing in a few years (...like this time). What I could really use some help with is WP:Capricorn since that's a lot of inherited code without CI/CD, an issue tracker (besides a talk page...) or a version control system (besides the page history...). Between figuring out how to migrate it to something like GitHub and the mounting technical debt, I've seriously considered just deprecating it and telling people to migrate to something else. I know some JS Gadgets on here do their development on github (maybe gitlab?) and have a pipeline for on-wiki deployments, but I haven't had the time or energy to research that process. If you're looking for a technical project, I think that's the place to start: figure out how to make it easier and safer to collaborate on JS code.That was the first GA review I started, in fact. While a good reminder that Wikipedia is not censored, I think the subject matter played a role in why the nomination was 37th oldest when the review was opened. That said, I was impressed by your knowledge of the sources and was surprised by the depth they went into for what I'd thought would be written off as a vice. — Wug·a·po·des 07:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Glad to hear the GAN Report code is stable. I don't suppose I would want to get into that Capricorn; thanks for the offer anyway. I would like to see the CAN Report source code, though. Prhartcom (talk) 22:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)