Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts

Today we enter the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts, a topic that has sparked the interest of many over the years. Since its emergence, Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts has been the subject of study, debate and controversy, making it an extremely relevant topic today. Throughout this article we will explore different aspects related to Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts, from its origin to its impact on current society. Without a doubt, this is a topic that does not leave anyone indifferent, and we are sure that you will find fascinating and interesting information about Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts in the following lines. Join us on this journey of discovery and learning!

Disambiguation pages are not encyclopedia articles – they are navigation aids!
Users arrive at these pages with a specific article in mind. So when you edit these pages:
DO:
Limit descriptions to what's necessary.
Put the link at the start of each entry.
Sort entries; group by subject if appropriate.
Put the primary topic at the top, if one exists.
Use {{Wiktionary}} for dictionary definitions.
Fix incoming links to target the intended page.
Tag pages that need work with {{dab cleanup}}.
DON'T:
Don't include entries without a blue link.
Don't include red links unless used in articles.
Don't include more than one blue link in an entry.
Don't include references or external links.
Don't list dictionary definitions.
Don't list every article containing the title.
Don't pipe links except to format.

Also:

Do consider joining WikiProject Disambiguation.

Notes

  1. ^ a b Unless the linked article is not the ambiguous item itself, but part of the description.
  2. ^ a b Put the wiktionary template at the top of the page to link to dictionary definitions.
  3. ^ To see if a link is used, visit the link, then use the "What links here" tool. Entries with a red link must also include a link to an article mentioning the term.

See also