In this article, we will explore in detail the topic of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Requested articles, with the aim of providing our readers with a comprehensive vision of this relevant aspect in today's society. We will address various aspects, from its origin and evolution to its implications in daily life, in order to offer a comprehensive look that allows us to understand its importance and impact in different areas. Through an exhaustive analysis, we aim to provide an enriching perspective that contributes to knowledge and reflection on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Requested articles, inviting the audience to delve deeper into a topic of great relevance today.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Requested articles, because it is used for the administration of the Requested articles process or it was formerly listed at Requested articles.Requested articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Requested articlesTemplate:WikiProject Requested articlesRequested
Just as a heads up, I've created a new IRC chat room to facilitate discussion among volunteers who are active in the requested article process. You can join it at #wikipedia-en-raconnect. ~ MatthewrbowkerDrop me a note05:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Bring back the high level index to requested articles
The requested articles high level index has disappeared. Now it takes forever to scroll down looking for the section you're interested in. Please bring back the high level index. Dough34 (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Me and @Tails Wx have decided (on discord) that this project is in need of a revival to help take care of the large backlog. Stay posted as further developments are coming soon. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:19, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Was this in the server or in DMs? What channel? Did you not check server history to see prior RA-related discussions? I would've participated if I had any awareness this was a proposal, and probably have the most individual experience with RA-of-the-last-few-years of any editor to know exactly what you'd be getting yourself into. Vaticidalprophet19:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Backlog blitzes do not solve the problem if they're having to be run constantly. How do you propose to actually get a number of users interested in and completing the requests? Hey man im josh (talk) 19:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
A MassMessage might work out to discuss the revival of the project, but I'm not sure if that's enough to warrant mass messaging. TailsWx20:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Well for a start making things like the medical disease article creator for more types of article would make creating them a lot simpler. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 11:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Per Discord commentary: I don't think a "let's put high standards on new submissions" framework works especially well to do anything, given 1. people don't read the directions anyway but more importantly 2. RA is old. As mentioned, I'd estimate the median age of listings as late 2000s. The problem (inasmuch as it's a problem) with RA is that people don't write articles off it, not that people are submitting articles to it, because they really don't do that much these days (AfC is strongly advertised, RA is no longer that easy to find). I am...really cautious...about the concept of a backlog drive for 'article creation', which seems like a way to get a lot of stubs and a lot of frustrating AfDs. (re. massmessage, as an MMS I'm pretty sure I'd get the right yanked with prejudice if I sent one; re. Signpost, the GAN backlog notif in the Signpost got very negligible views)
I mentioned that putting WhatamIdoing in the loop here is probably a reasonable idea given her specific combination of institutional memory, notability-related policy experience, and awareness that No, Seriously, Asking People To Read The Directions Will Not Work. I stand by that, though I haven't pinged her here yet given that's a bit...abrupt. There are other editors who could also reasonably be queried for institutional-memory (though I think I might be the only institutional-memory for 2020s-era RA -- god, that's a scary thought). Vaticidalprophet20:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)