Today, Wikipedia:Double redirects is an issue that is present in all spheres of society. From politics to pop culture, Wikipedia:Double redirects has become a constant talking point. This trend has led to an increase in attention and interest in Wikipedia:Double redirects, both from experts and laypeople. In this article, we will explore the various aspects of Wikipedia:Double redirects, from its historical origins to its impact on the world today. We will analyze how Wikipedia:Double redirects has evolved over time and examine its influence in different areas. Additionally, we will discuss the future implications of Wikipedia:Double redirects and how it can affect our lives in the future.
This is an information page. It is not an encyclopedic article, nor one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting. |
This page in a nutshell: A double redirect is a redirect to another redirect. The MediaWiki software is not programmed to follow these redirects. Double redirects are easily fixed by bots, and human editors should devote their efforts elsewhere. However, an editor should not leave behind the double redirects that they created themselves. |
A redirect is a special type of page that automatically causes another page to be displayed in its place. The displayed page is called a redirect target. A redirect that points to another redirect is called a double redirect. These pages are unwanted, because Wikipedia's MediaWiki software is currently configured to not follow the second redirect. The MediaWiki feature which would have allowed it is declined as it is too hard to implement. If someone is redirected to a redirect, the chain stops after the first redirect, like in the example. These situations create unpleasant experiences for the reader and make the navigational structure of the site confusing.
Double redirects are usually created after a page move, when old redirects are left unchanged and pointing towards an old name. Although bots fix most of these within a few days from creation automatically, editors should take care not to manually create double redirects.
Double redirects are easily and automatically fixed by bots, and most are fixed within a few days of creation. Because of this, human editors would be best-off putting their time on other tasks that can't be automated. However, bots can't fix a double redirect if the redirect page is fully protected. The following bots fix double redirects:
Name | Tasks | Owner | First Approval | Status | Link(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AvicBot (talk · contribs) | Fixing double redirects, other tasks | Avicennasis | 22 July 2011 | -Inactive | Rights · BRFAs |
EmausBot (talk · contribs) | Resolve double redirects | Emaus | 9 January 2011 | -Active | Rights · BRFAs |
RussBot (talk · contribs) | Fixing double redirects and disambiguation links, maintaining WP:DPM, maintaining redirected categories |
R'n'B | 2 June 2005 | -Active | Rights · BRFAs 1 · 2 |
Xqbot (talk · contribs) | Fixing double redirects, other tasks | Xqt | 13 December 2009 | -Active | Rights · BRFAs |
This list was compiled from Wikipedia:Bots/Status.
Current list:
Old lists:
Suppose you want to check whether there are any double redirects to page C. Go to page C and click "What links here" (usually the first link in the "Toolbox" on the left-hand side of the page). Double (or multiple) redirects are those pages which appear in the list with both of these properties:
Note that if you've just moved page C, then there might be only one page which is not indented, (the page at the top of the list), and everything else might be indented at least one level.
Once all double redirects have been fixed, the "What links here" page will have only three types of pages listed:
The first and third categories do not need to be fixed – see Wikipedia:Redirect § Do not "fix" links to redirects that are not broken.
MediaWiki will not follow a redirect if: